<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
W net = E E 0 = γ mc 2 mc 2 = γ 1 mc 2 .

Relativistically, we have W net = KE rel size 12{W="KE" rSub { size 8{"rel"} } } {} .

Relativistic kinetic energy

Relativistic kinetic energy is

KE rel = γ 1 mc 2 . size 12{"KE" rSub { size 8{"rel"} } = left (γ - 1 right ) ital "mc" rSup { size 8{2} } } {}

When motionless, we have v = 0 size 12{v=0} {} and

γ = 1 1 v 2 c 2 = 1 , size 12{γ= { {1} over { sqrt {1 - { {v rSup { size 8{2} } } over {c rSup { size 8{2} } } } } } } =1} {}

so that KE rel = 0 size 12{"KE" rSub { size 8{"rel"} } =0} {} at rest, as expected. But the expression for relativistic kinetic energy (such as total energy and rest energy) does not look much like the classical 1 2 mv 2 size 12{ { {1} over {2} } ital "mv" rSup { size 8{2} } } {} . To show that the classical expression for kinetic energy is obtained at low velocities, we note that the binomial expansion for γ size 12{γ} {} at low velocities gives

γ = 1 + 1 2 v 2 c 2 . size 12{γ=1+ { {1} over {2} } { {v rSup { size 8{2} } } over {c rSup { size 8{2} } } } } {}

A binomial expansion is a way of expressing an algebraic quantity as a sum of an infinite series of terms. In some cases, as in the limit of small velocity here, most terms are very small. Thus the expression derived for γ size 12{γ} {} here is not exact, but it is a very accurate approximation. Thus, at low velocities,

γ 1 = 1 2 v 2 c 2 . size 12{γ - 1= { {1} over {2} } { {v rSup { size 8{2} } } over {c rSup { size 8{2} } } } } {}

Entering this into the expression for relativistic kinetic energy gives

KE rel = 1 2 v 2 c 2 mc 2 = 1 2 mv 2 = KE class .

So, in fact, relativistic kinetic energy does become the same as classical kinetic energy when v << c size 12{v"<<"c} {} .

It is even more interesting to investigate what happens to kinetic energy when the velocity of an object approaches the speed of light. We know that γ size 12{γ} {} becomes infinite as v size 12{v} {} approaches c size 12{c} {} , so that KE rel also becomes infinite as the velocity approaches the speed of light. (See [link] .) An infinite amount of work (and, hence, an infinite amount of energy input) is required to accelerate a mass to the speed of light.

The speed of light

No object with mass can attain the speed of light.

So the speed of light is the ultimate speed limit for any particle having mass. All of this is consistent with the fact that velocities less than c size 12{c} {} always add to less than c size 12{c} {} . Both the relativistic form for kinetic energy and the ultimate speed limit being c size 12{c} {} have been confirmed in detail in numerous experiments. No matter how much energy is put into accelerating a mass, its velocity can only approach—not reach—the speed of light.

In this figure a graph is shown on a coordinate system of axes. The x-axis is labeled as speed v (m/s). On the x-axis, velocity of the object is shown in terms of the speed of light starting from zero at origin to c, where c is the speed of light. The y-axis is labeled as Kinetic Energy K E (J). On the y-axis, relativistic kinetic energy is shown starting from 0 at origin to 1.0. The graph K sub r e l of relativistic kinetic energy is concave up and moving upward along the vertical line at x equals c. This graph shows that relativistic kinetic energy approaches infinity as the velocity of an object approaches the speed of light. Also shown is that when the speed of the object is equal to the speed of light c the kinetic energy is known as classical kinetic energy, which is denoted as K E sub class.
This graph of KE rel size 12{"KE" rSub { size 8{"rel"} } } {} versus velocity shows how kinetic energy approaches infinity as velocity approaches the speed of light. It is thus not possible for an object having mass to reach the speed of light. Also shown is KE class size 12{"KE" rSub { size 8{"class"} } } {} , the classical kinetic energy, which is similar to relativistic kinetic energy at low velocities. Note that much more energy is required to reach high velocities than predicted classically.

Comparing kinetic energy: relativistic energy versus classical kinetic energy

An electron has a velocity v = 0 . 990 c size 12{v=0 "." "990"c} {} . (a) Calculate the kinetic energy in MeV of the electron. (b) Compare this with the classical value for kinetic energy at this velocity. (The mass of an electron is 9 . 11 × 10 31 kg size 12{9 "." "11" times "10" rSup { size 8{ - "31"} } " kg"} {} .)

Strategy

The expression for relativistic kinetic energy is always correct, but for (a) it must be used since the velocity is highly relativistic (close to c size 12{c} {} ). First, we will calculate the relativistic factor γ size 12{γ} {} , and then use it to determine the relativistic kinetic energy. For (b), we will calculate the classical kinetic energy (which would be close to the relativistic value if v size 12{v} {} were less than a few percent of c size 12{c} {} ) and see that it is not the same.

Questions & Answers

find the equation of the tangent to the curve y=2x³-x²+3x+1 at the points x=1 and x=3
Esther Reply
derivative of logarithms function
Iqra Reply
how to solve this question
sidra
ex 2.1 question no 11
khansa
anyone can help me
khansa
question please
Rasul
ex 2.1 question no. 11
khansa
i cant type here
khansa
Find the derivative of g(x)=−3.
Abdullah Reply
any genius online ? I need help!!
Guzorochi Reply
how can i help you?
Pina
need to learn polynomial
Zakariya
i will teach...
nandu
I'm waiting
Zakariya
plz help me in question
Abish
How can I help you?
Tlou
evaluate the following computation (x³-8/x-2)
Murtala Reply
teach me how to solve the first law of calculus.
Uncle Reply
teach me also how to solve the first law of calculus
Bilson
what is differentiation
Ibrahim Reply
only god knows😂
abdulkadir
f(x) = x-2 g(x) = 3x + 5 fog(x)? f(x)/g(x)
Naufal Reply
fog(x)= f(g(x)) = x-2 = 3x+5-2 = 3x+3 f(x)/g(x)= x-2/3x+5
diron
pweding paturo nsa calculus?
jimmy
how to use fundamental theorem to solve exponential
JULIA Reply
find the bounded area of the parabola y^2=4x and y=16x
Omar Reply
what is absolute value means?
Geo Reply
Chicken nuggets
Hugh
🐔
MM
🐔🦃 nuggets
MM
(mathematics) For a complex number a+bi, the principal square root of the sum of the squares of its real and imaginary parts, √a2+b2 . Denoted by | |. The absolute value |x| of a real number x is √x2 , which is equal to x if x is non-negative, and −x if x is negative.
Ismael
find integration of loge x
Game Reply
find the volume of a solid about the y-axis, x=0, x=1, y=0, y=7+x^3
Godwin Reply
how does this work
Brad Reply
Can calculus give the answers as same as other methods give in basic classes while solving the numericals?
Cosmos Reply
log tan (x/4+x/2)
Rohan
please answer
Rohan
y=(x^2 + 3x).(eipix)
Claudia
is this a answer
Ismael
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply
Practice Key Terms 3

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, College physics. OpenStax CNX. Jul 27, 2015 Download for free at http://legacy.cnx.org/content/col11406/1.9
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'College physics' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask